there are two distinct aspects of strategic technology planning. One is socioeconomic and the other is pragmatic/technical. The traditional focus on the creation of a planning document tends to merge these aspects and obscure the distinction, often leading to confusion and frustration. The differences between socioeconomic objectives -- which are essentially strategic -- and technical goals -- which are primarily operational -- are non-trivial: while the former need to be stable and comprehensive, the latter need to be agile and responsive to rapid changes in technology and in users' needs. We believe strategic planning for technology is not an oxymoron, yet a failure to appreciate the dual character of technology planning can make it seem that way. Many technology officers with whom we spoke intuitively recognize the essence of good planning and achieve impressive outcomes with a minimum of frustration. Our goal in this study is to bring these underlying practices and perspectives together into an explicit -- and relatively simple -- model of a good technology planning process. "
http://www.cause.org/information-resources/ir-library/html/cem9814.html
"Less than a third (28.9 percent) of the campuses participating in the 1997 Campus Computing Survey reported having a working financial plan for technology, virtually unchanged from 1996 (28.1 percent). The vast majority of U.S. colleges and universities (70.1 percent) continue to fund most of their equipment, network, and software expenses with one-time budget allocations or special appropriations. Moreover, the majority of colleges and universities (51.6 percent) continue to operate without a strategic plan for information technology. Survey data suggest that a large proportion of technology spending is "opportunistic" -dependent on "budget dust," or year-end money, to underwrite upgraded labs, new computers for faculty, and other IT costs. "
"The keys to developing an effective financing strategy-- IT Financial Planning 101-- are to understand market and demand trends in technology, identify and classify total technology costs, develop an effective life-cycle budgeting model for technology, and finally identify and match funding streams that efficiently cover the institution's total annual technology cost. "
http://www.nacubo.org/website/members/bomag/9803/101.html